Does a divorce action for separate maintenance between the same parties involve the same subject matter within the meaning of the above stated rule?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Mungia v. Superior Court for Los Angeles County, 225 Cal.App.2d 280, 37 Cal.Rptr. 285 (Cal. App. 1964):

There is no reason to doubt that an action for divorce and an action for separate maintenance between the same parties involve the same subject matter, within the meaning of the above stated rule. (Cf. Rilcoff v. Superior Court, 50 Cal.App.2d 503, 123 P.2d 540.) It would be absurd to permit these parties to carry on the two actions between them in different counties.

Other Questions


In a personal injury action brought by a former wife against her ex-partner in a civil action, in addition to a similar action against the husband in a separate action, can the court order return to husband in the civil action? (California, United States of America)
What relation does an attorney for a party to a divorce case have in the subject matter of the action? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between an action for separate maintenance based on the ground of cruelty and an action of divorce? (California, United States of America)
If the full credit bid rule is extended to bar fraud actions against third parties, can appellant bring an action against the third party? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a crime committed by the same person as a separate crime is separate and involved separate objectives? (California, United States of America)
Can a third party claimant be adjudicated as a party in a divorce action? (California, United States of America)
When a plaintiff joins a separate cause of action for which attorney fees are permitted, can the prevailing party recover on the other side of the action? (California, United States of America)
Is Proposition 8 a single subject subject to the single subject rule? (California, United States of America)
Does a party have to independently demonstrate that statements made by a party under section 425.16, subdivision (e) constitute a "public issue" within the meaning of the Public Issue? (California, United States of America)
Is a party who transfers his interest in an action after the action has been commenced and before judgment the proper party to appeal? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.