California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hale, 244 Cal.Rptr. 114, 44 Cal.3d 531, 749 P.2d 769 (Cal. 1988):
Defendant persuasively argues that the court's failure to hold a competency hearing pursuant to section 1368 constituted a denial of due process under Pate v. Robinson (1966) 383 U.S. 375, 377, 86 S.Ct. 836, 837, 15 L.Ed.2d 815. Specifically, defendant contends that the failure to hold a competency hearing before trial, following the court's explicit expression of doubt as to defendant's competency and its subsequent order requiring a section 1368 hearing, cannot be cured by a retrospective appellate determination of his probable competence to stand trial. Rather, defendant asserts, the conviction must be set aside and, if the prosecution wishes to retry
Page 119
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.