Does a denial of a motion for a new trial grounded on jury misconduct constitute prejudice?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Tillery v. Richland, 158 Cal.App.3d 957, 205 Cal.Rptr. 191 (Cal. App. 1984):

[158 Cal.App.3d 970] Further, it has been held that: "A denial of a motion for new trial grounded on jury misconduct implies a determination by the trial judge that the misconduct did not result in prejudice." (Andrews v. County of Orange (1982) 130 Cal.App.3d 944, 954, 182 Cal.Rptr. 176.)

Other Questions


What is the test for a motion for a new trial on nonstatutory grounds such as denial of a fair trial after being denied a trial by a jury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for denying a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion under the first two grounds? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion for a new trial be made on the ground of the denial of a motion to continue the trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a motion of appeal against a finding that the trial court erred in failing to grant a new trial on the grounds of misconduct of counsel? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges on appeal a motion for a new trial on grounds of juror misconduct, does he accept the credibility determinations and findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant bring a motion for a new trial on the grounds that the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct during trial? (California, United States of America)
What constitutes misconduct under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution when it infects the trial with such unfairness as to make the conviction a denial of due process? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.