California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Parker v. Robert E. McKee, Inc., 3 Cal.App.4th 512, 4 Cal.Rptr.2d 347 (Cal. App. 1992):
2 The procedural posture of this case is somewhat muddied because in opposition to respondent's demurrer, which was based on the face of the original complaint, appellant submitted a declaration. However, it is error to sustain a demurrer without leave to amend, if there is any reasonable probability the complaint can be amended to state a good cause of action. (Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation Dist. (1969) 70 Cal.2d 240, 244-245, 74 Cal.Rptr. 398, 449 P.2d 462.) Since we conclude the declaration of appellant's counsel shows appellant can allege facts entitling him to name respondent as a previously sued Doe, it was error to sustain the demurrer without leave to amend.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.