Does a defendant who chooses professional representation in a criminal case have any tactical control?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Brown, B270677 (Cal. App. 2017):

A criminal defendant who "chooses professional representation, . . . waives tactical control; counsel is at all times in charge of the case and bears the responsibility for providing constitutionally effective assistance. . . ." (D'Arcy, supra, 48 Cal.4th at p. 282; see also People v. Valdez (2004) 32 Cal.4th 73, 95.) There is no exception for the testifying defendant.

Other Questions


Can a self-represented defendant be found guilty of a criminal act against a criminal defendant under section 352 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of section 27706(a) of the California Criminal Code on the appointment of a public defender to defend a defendant in an appeal from a misdemeanor conviction? (California, United States of America)
Does an attorney representing a criminal defendant have the right to control trial tactics and strategy? (California, United States of America)
Can a criminal defendant be punished more than once for the same criminal act or for a series of criminal acts? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a defendant has committed a criminal offence against a defendant in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have to provide a record of criminal convictions and a history of criminal activity with respect to criminal convictions? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by multiple convictions for multiple offences punishable by the same criminal offence against the same defendant concurrent with one criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of both counts of membership of a criminal street gang and a charge of criminal activity under section 654 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is there an undue "chilling effect" on the procedural rights of criminal defendants when the jury instructs a criminal defendant to testify before the jury that he will be cross-examined? (California, United States of America)
Can a criminal defendant suffer multiple convictions for a single criminal act or series of related criminal acts? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.