Does a defendant's ability to suggest additional steps in the course of a criminal investigation render the prosecution's efforts "unreasonable"?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Grattan, D065292 (Cal. App. 2016):

defendant's ability to suggest additional steps (usually, as here, with the benefit of hindsight) does not automatically render the prosecution's efforts "unreasonable." ' " (People v. Diaz (2002) 95 Cal.App.4th 695, 706.)

Other Questions


Can a self-represented defendant be found guilty of a criminal act against a criminal defendant under section 352 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654, subdivision (a) of the California Criminal Code, Section 654 of the Criminal Code protect a defendant against prosecution for an act or omission committed during a course of conduct deemed to be indivisible in time? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for the use of the STEP Act to determine whether a defendant who fired a gun repeatedly at a group of people was a member of a criminal gang, who then committed the crime for the benefit of the criminal gang? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of undercover officers' subterfuge in the course of a criminal investigation on a defendant's confession? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 1385 of the California Criminal Code apply to a defendant in a case where there is evidence that the prosecution of defendants was inappropriate? (California, United States of America)
Can a criminal defendant be punished more than once for the same criminal act or for a series of criminal acts? (California, United States of America)
Can a criminal defendant refuse to cooperate with his attorney in an effort to avoid prosecution? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be convicted of both counts of membership of a criminal street gang and a charge of criminal activity under section 654 of the California Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is a criminal offence punishable by multiple convictions for multiple offences punishable by the same criminal offence against the same defendant concurrent with one criminal offence? (California, United States of America)
Is there an undue "chilling effect" on the procedural rights of criminal defendants when the jury instructs a criminal defendant to testify before the jury that he will be cross-examined? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.