Does a defendant need substitute counsel to prepare and argue a motion for a new trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. La Riva, G056352 (Cal. App. 2019):

Regardless, defendant never requested substitute counsel. People v. Gay (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 1065 (Gay) is instructive. In Gay, the defendant filed a handwritten motion for new trial claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. (Id. at pp. 1066-1067.) He asserted his appointed counsel failed to provide an adequate defense but did not request the court appoint new counsel to prepare or argue the motion for new trial. (Id. at pp. 1067-1068.) The trial court denied the motion without questioning the defendant or his counsel about the claimed ineffective assistance of counsel. (Ibid.) On appeal, the defendant argued the trial court erred because it "failed to determine whether it should appoint substitute counsel to present his motion for new trial." (Ibid.) The appellate court rejected the defendant's contention because he did not request substitute

Page 22

counsel to prepare and present a motion for new trial based on inadequate representation. (Id. at p. 1071.)

Other Questions


If a defendant makes a motion for a continuance of trial on grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, is it appropriate to appoint a new counsel to prepare the motion? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Can counsel argue that counsel argued that a motion for a new trial was invalid on the grounds of "irregularity in the proceedings"? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant deprived of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel when a trial court denies his motion to substitute one appointed counsel for another? (California, United States of America)
In arguing that the trial court abused its power to deny a motion to sever an indecent exposure charge from a sexual assault charge, does defendant rely on Earle v Earle to argue that the motion was abused? (California, United States of America)
Does the Defendant have any grounds to argue that it was error to deny the Defendant's motion to dismiss the Motion to Dismiss under section 995 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Does a deputy district attorney acquiesce in having the motion heard during the trial of a defendant before trial, rather than prior to trial? (California, United States of America)
How has the trial court treated a motion to suppress a motion by a public defender appointed to represent defendant? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain a new trial on the grounds that the trial court did not abuse its discretion to deny the motion on the same grounds as the previous motion? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue on appeal that counsel's inaction at trial to alleged prosecutorial misconduct violated their constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.