Does a defendant need a law review article on contrived issue?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Dubarry Internat., Inc. v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc., 231 Cal.App.3d 552, 282 Cal.Rptr. 181 (Cal. App. 1991):
We do not need a law review article, or for that matter a defendant's primer, on a contrived issue. This is especially so, where the resolution of the issue has significant consequences. (See Howard v. Drapkin (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 843, 271 Cal.Rptr. 893.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a plaintiff's claim for damages arising from defendants' conduct "in connection with a public issue or issue of public interest"? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant obtain review of certificate issues unless he has complied with section 1237.5 and rule 31(d), first paragraph, fully? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant denied equal protection because he has not received either intercase proportionality review or appropriate intracase review? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
What is the scope of a defendant's in camera review of an in-camera review of a prosecutor's file regarding an informant's past experiences with dangerous drugs? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant required to independently demonstrate that the issue is a "public issue" within the meaning of section 425.16, subdivision (e) of the California Code of Civil Procedure? (California, United States of America)
Does defendant's absence from the introductory hearing on the issue of prosecution witness Darlington affect his opportunity to defend against the charges? (California, United States of America)
Is there an exception to the forfeiture rule when a defendant raises an issue reviewable de novo on appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the consequence of defendant forfeited appellate review of the issue? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
