California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Camacho, A132875 (Cal. App. 2016):
23. At no time in the trial court did defendant object to his sentences on the grounds he now asserts on appeal. To the extent an objection was required to preserve his appellate claims, we have considered his arguments on the merits in light of his contention that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object in the trial court. (See People v. DeJesus (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 1, 27 [court considers constitutionality of sentence to " 'forestall a subsequent claim of ineffectiveness of counsel' "].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.