Does a defendant have to make Use of a gun before making Use of the gun?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Evans, 115 Cal.Rptr. 304, 40 Cal.App.3d 582 (Cal. App. 1974):
The crime of violating section 12021 of the Penal Code had been violated before defendant had made Use of the gun. The language of the court in People v. Neese (1969) 272 Cal.App.2d 235, 245, 77 Cal.Rptr. 314, 321, is apropros:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What authority does a defendant have to make an election to determine whether a defendant should be charged with making terrorist threats? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reinitiation of a waiver of a Defendant's right to make a claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for making a Defendant pay a Defendant's unlawful detainer? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury make a preliminary determination of whether a defendant had the right to use force to defend himself against the victim? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who makes a threat to set fire to a building where the victim works after making the threat? (California, United States of America)
Is a claim for damages brought by defendant in a personal injury action brought by plaintiff against defendant in the Superior Court of Appeal against Defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury make a preliminary determination of whether a defendant had the right to use force to defend himself under Cal.CRIM 3471? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
