Does a defendant have grounds to argue that the court erred in permitting the jury to hear evidence of uncharged misconduct?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Riel, 22 Cal.4th 1153, 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 1, 998 P.2d 969 (Cal. 2000):

Defendant contends the court erred in permitting the jury to hear evidence of uncharged misconduct. As he recognizes, with one partial exception, he did not object to this evidence at trial; indeed, he elicited some of it himself. Accordingly, he cannot challenge its admissibility on appeal. (People v. Champion, supra, 9 Cal.4th at p. 918, 39 Cal.Rptr.2d 547, 891 P.2d 93.)

Other Questions


Does defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court of Appeal overturned a finding that a prosecutor improperly admitted evidence of sexual assault under section 352(b) of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant argue that a lower court found for plaintiff because the court disbelieved defendant's evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has successfully argued that the trial court erred by not admitting or excluding evidence about his alleged homeless status? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have grounds to argue that the court improperly considered a probation report containing additional aggravating evidence not before the jury? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have any grounds to argue that the trial court erred in failing to give the cautionary instruction at the end of trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have authority to exclude evidence where a defendant has been found to be contrary to the evidence code under section 352 of the California Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.