California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Deans, F073871 (Cal. App. 2019):
14. Our determination that the penalty provision findings are not supported by substantial evidence renders defendant's claim of evidentiary error moot, but we observe that "when reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence for purposes of deciding whether retrial is permissible, the reviewing court must consider all of the evidence presented at trial, including evidence that should not have been admitted." (People v. Story (2009) 45 Cal.4th 1282, 1296.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.