California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Keenan, 250 Cal.Rptr. 550, 46 Cal.3d 478, 758 P.2d 1081 (Cal. 1988):
Defendant had no inherent right to a binding advance ruling which would spare him the necessity of raising specific objections before the jury. Even had the court's remarks constituted an in limine ruling against him, they would not have been binding at trial. (See Code Civ.Proc., former 128, subd. 8 [now 128, subd. (a)(8) ]; cf. People v. Campa (1984) 36 Cal.3d 870, 885-886, 206 Cal.Rptr. 114, 686 P.2d 634; People v. Beasley (1967) 250 Cal.App.2d 71, 76-77, 58 Cal.Rptr. 485.) No error occurred.
E. Irrelevant aggravating evidence.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.