Does a defendant have a right to present irrelevant evidence at trial?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from Carrillo v. McDonald, Case No.: 1:12-cv-01203-JLT (E.D. Cal. 2015):

defendant does not have a right to present irrelevant evidence. Wood v. State of Alaska, 957 F.2d 1544, 1549 (9th Cir.1992). The determination of whether evidence is relevant rests in the discretion of the trial court. Id.

Other Questions


Does a defendant who fails to appear at trial have a right to be present at trial? ("New York", United States of America)
What rights does a defendant have to present evidence in a criminal trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a defendant who overdoses on a drug during the course of his trial have waived his right to be present at trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a constitutional right to introduce evidence and present a defense at trial? ("New York", United States of America)
Does a defendant who is in custody have the right to waive his right to be present at trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a harsher sentence for a defendant's assertion of his right to trial a punishment for his assertion that he did not have a fair trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a right to be present at trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any evidence of a policy of the trial judge to more severely punish defendants who demanded a trial rather than pleading guilty? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a defendant's right to a jury trial extend to the factual determination of whether that defendant has suffered a prior conviction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a defendant have an unlimited right to present inadmissible evidence? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.