The following excerpt is from Seagrave v. Lake County Sheriff's Dept., 98 F.3d 1346 (9th Cir. 1996):
Absent compelling circumstances, a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to appear before a jury free of shackles. See Spain v. Rushen, 883 F.2d 712, 716, 720 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 910 (1990). To succeed on a claim of unconstitutional shackling, however, a defendant must show that the shackling "had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict." Rhoden v. Rowland, 10 F.3d 1457, 1460 (9th Cir.1993) (internal quotations omitted). "Of course, if the jurors never saw [the defendant's] shackles, then he cannot show prejudice." Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.