Does a defendant have a constitutional right to appoint an expert to the defence of their case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Black, B233126 (Cal. App. 2012):
It is true that indigent defendants have a constitutional right to appointment of an expert when reasonably necessary for the defense of their case. (Corenevsky v. Superior Court (1984) 36 Cal.3d 307, 319-320.) However, defendant has failed to cite any case
Page 15
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does Defendant have any grounds to argue that the Court's recent rulings in a civil case against the Defendant violated the Defendant's civil rights? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant's claim that the exclusion of evidence in the trial of a defendant in a sexual assault case violated his federal constitutional right to present a defense? (California, United States of America)
What waiver of appeal rights apply to a criminal defendant who knowingly waives any significant right such as constitutional rights? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a constitutional right to appoint an expert at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a constitutional right to present irrelevant evidence in the defence? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have a constitutional right to continue to present a defense in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor who makes a statement before a jury that touches on one defendant's right to silence and representation constitute a constitutional violation? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
