Does a defendant have a claim that he was unlawfully compelled to make false statements during an interview with a police officer?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Ross, C058434 (Cal. App. 3/18/2010), C058434. (Cal. App. 2010):

Defendant contends the trial court erred in admitting the statements he made during a March 26, 2007, interview with law enforcement officers. He contends his statements were unlawfully elicited in violation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694] (Miranda) after he had invoked his right to consult an attorney.

Other Questions


Can a defendant who claims self-defense to a charge of battery upon a police officer, who is also charged with battery upon the officer, obtain materials from the police department concerning the propensity for violence against the officer? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a police officer compel a defendant to give a sworn statement? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting an admission of a statement to a police officer that he would kill the first police officer to step inside his cell if he was not permitted to visit with his wife? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that he was coerced into giving evidence in a second interview by police officers that he had been threatened with the death penalty? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted statements made by police officers in an interview with defendant in an assault case? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who shot an off-duty police officer in the head with a single shot, get out of his car, get into his car and shoot the officer as the officer is approaching? (California, United States of America)
Can a Defendant challenge a finding that the victim's statements to police officers were admissible as prior inconsistent statements? (California, United States of America)
Does a lack of training in a police interview result in the suppression of a defendant's interview statements? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court reject a defendant's claim of an implied promise of leniency in statements from police officers that they were there to listen and then to help you out? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.