The following excerpt is from Gronlund v. Anderson (In re Gronlund), Adv. No. 6:12-1173, BAP No. CC-13-1566-KiTaPa, Bk. No. 6:12-14417 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2014):
A debtor's intent need not be fraudulent to meet the requirements of 727(a)(2). Because the language of the statute is in the disjunctive, it is sufficient if the debtor's intent is to hinder or delay a creditor. Bernard v. Sheaffer (In re Bernard), 96 F.3d 1279, 1281 (9th Cir. 1996).
Page 14
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.