Does a court order requiring electronic monitoring violate a plaintiff's right against self-incrimination?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Keenan v. Superior Court, 126 Cal.App.3d 576, 177 Cal.Rptr. 841 (Cal. App. 1981):
Next, citing Prudhomme v. Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 320, 85 Cal.Rptr. 129, 466 P.2d 673 and its progeny, petitioner claims that the monitoring permitted by the order complained of violates his right against self-incrimination. He further maintains that such monitoring will violate his attorney-client privilege.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of a Federal Court finding that a federal court violated a plaintiff's constitutional rights by imposing fees and fines without making a determination of his ability to pay? (California, United States of America)
When will a court strike down a probation order requiring a defendant to search their electronic devices in order to be placed on probation? (California, United States of America)
How have courts interpreted a stipulation that a plaintiff must pay any fees that the court might order after hearing an appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does a probation order requiring a defendant to pay fines on or before the end of probation violate his right to due process and equal protection? (California, United States of America)
Is a father's claim that the court's order granting mother sole legal and physical custody of their children violates his right to see his children? (California, United States of America)
Does a protective order requiring a mother to be appointed as counsel in a guardianship proceeding violate the right to possess a firearm? (California, United States of America)
On remand, in what circumstances will the trial court order that a plaintiff be entitled to the same amount of compensation as a plaintiff in a class action? (California, United States of America)
When a judgment of divorce is not self-executing in respect of any division of property ordered, does the court have jurisdiction to make further orders to compel obedience to the order? (California, United States of America)
Does dismissal of an action for failure to comply with a court order violate the right to a jury trial? (California, United States of America)
