Does a court have to instruct a jury on the weight of expert testimony?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Cox, C079128 (Cal. App. 2018):

Section 1127b requires a trial court to instruct sua sponte on the weight of expert testimony whenever it admits expert opinion into evidence in a criminal proceeding.4 The failure to so instruct is not prejudicial "unless the reviewing court, upon an examination of the entire cause, determines that the jury might have rendered a different verdict had the omitted instruction been given." (People v. Reeder (1976) 65 Cal.App.3d 235, 241.) In this matter, the trial court admitted expert testimony but failed to instruct the jury as required by section 1127b. Based on our review of the record, we conclude the error was not prejudicial.

Page 10

Other Questions


Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the jury be instructed to follow the law as instructed, rather than consider any comments by the prosecutor that conflicted with the trial court's instructions? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applied by appellate courts to a decision by a trial court to instruct or not to instruct a jury? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have to grant immunity to a witness who testified in a witness testimony that the testimony was inconsistent with the instructions? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated expert testimony in the context of police investigations and subsequent court proceedings? (California, United States of America)
How have instructions been interpreted in a sexual assault case where a jury was instructed to give considerable weight to the testimony of an accomplice? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.