Does a court commit error in instructing or failing to instruct the jury in a civil case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Ramirez, B270965 (Cal. App. 2017):

We review de novo the question of whether a court commits error in instructing or failing to instruct the jury. (People v. Waidla (2000) 22 Cal.4th 690, 733; People v. Hernandez (2013) 217 Cal.App.4th 559, 568.)

In a criminal case, the jury verdict must be unanimous. (Cal. Const., art. 1, 16; People v. Russo (2001) 25 Cal.4th 1124, 1132 (Russo).) "As a general rule, when violation of a criminal statute is charged and the evidence establishes several acts, any one of which could constitute the crime charged, either the state must select the particular act upon

Page 12

Other Questions


In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
In a contract impairment case arising out of section 340.9(1) of the California Civil Code of Civil Procedure Act, is there any case law where the court has found that the provision does not apply to all cases? (California, United States of America)
If defendant fails to establish all the errors of the trial court as a cumulative result of the cumulative error, can he continue to argue that the cumulative effect of the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt and mandates reversal? (California, United States of America)
Is there any instructional error in general criminal intent instruction used by the trial court to include counts 4 and 7 in the General Criminal intent instruction? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Supreme Court strike down a section of the Civil Rights Act that prohibits the use of certain types of civil rights, such as civil liberties, as well as those of the individual, in the context of civil liberties? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts interpreted the instructions in the context of manslaughter instructions in cases where the instruction was limited or limited? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where the court committed prejudicial error by instructing the jury with both CALCRIM No. 371 and No. 372? (California, United States of America)
Can an appellant seek review of an instruction in the Superior Court of Appeal where the original instruction was found to have made errors that could have been cured in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reversal of a jury verdict in a civil case where the court failed to instruct the jury on the lesser included misdemeanor charge of battery without injury? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, if the trial court improperly failed to instruct on a lesser included offense, does the court have to re-examine the facts of the case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.