California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from FTR Int'l, Inc. v. Bd. of Trs. of the L. A. Cmty. Coll. Dist., B242220 (Cal. App. 2015):
21. Moreover, we find no meaningful distinction between this case and Ogborn v. City of Lancaster (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 448. There, the court held that a public official charged with administering a city's nuisance abatement program was entitled to immunity after "making the discretionary policy decision to declare [a property] a nuisance." (Id. at p. 461.) Debarring a contractor is no less a policy decision than declaring that a nuisance exists.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.