The plaintiffs rely on Dobie v. Dobie Estate (1995), 8 E.T.R. (2d) 223 (B.C.S.C.). That case concerned an action by a plaintiff for unjust enrichment. The plaintiff requested that the court impose a constructive trust as a remedy. Coultas J. held that the Limitation Act does not distinguish between express, implied and constructive trusts (at para. 23), and that a ten-year limitation applied to the plaintiff’s claim (at para. 46).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.