What is the test for proportionality and reasonableness in fixing costs in a personal injury case?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Mignault v. Lauzon, 2018 ONSC 7140 (CanLII):
Proportionality and reasonableness are the touchstone considerations to be applied in fixing the amount of costs. Proportionality is a core principle that not only governs the conduct of the proceedings generally, but is specifically applicable to fixing costs. Beaver v. Hill, supra, at paras. 12 and 19.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the scope of the reasonableness and proportionality of a cost determination in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for proportionality and reasonableness when determining the amount of costs in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to pay the costs of preparing a Bill of Costs and costs submission in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for reasonableness and proportionality in awarding costs in a personal injury matter? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for fixing costs in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for disbursements of personal injury compensation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining the proportionality and reasonableness of costs in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion to add as parties to a personal injury action for personal injury costs granted? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a judge to order personal costs against counsel in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on personal injury representation in personal injury cases? (Ontario, Canada)
