Does cross examination on the affidavit of documents constitute a proper discovery?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Logan v. Harper, 2003 CanLII 15592 (ON SC):

For clarity, I consider questions concerning the existence of documents and the adequacy of documentary production to be proper discovery questions. This is implicit in the Bow Helicopters v. Textron[10] decision frequently applied by this court. I consider that whether it is described as cross examination on the affidavit of documents or not, these are proper discovery questions and should be answered.

Other Questions


Can a party who fails to assert privilege over a document be served with a supplementary affidavit of documents in which the privilege is properly claimed? (Ontario, Canada)
Under what circumstances will an employer be required to cross-examine a witness in cross-examination? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the timetable for the hearing of a motion for cross examinations, cross examinations and factsums? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the consequence of a failure to cross-examine the complainant in cross-examination? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a deponent be cross-examined in the examination for discovery of a party who was unavailable at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the proper procedure for cross-examination on the affidavits of the Respondent? (Ontario, Canada)
Can an Affidavit of Documents be examined for discovery? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a party's failure to cross-examine a witness on their affidavit admissible at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a plaintiff rely on the evidence of defendants in their July 24, 2011 affidavits if they have not been challenged in cross-examinations? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for properly constituted medical examination? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.