What is the test for the argument that a plaintiff has limited means?
Manitoba, Canada
The following excerpt is from R.E.R. v. T.L.W-R., 2006 MBQB 67 (CanLII):
If “limited means” is the argument, it is incumbent upon the party advancing it to provide a complete and current picture of her financial circumstances, whether that argument goes to quantification of costs, time to pay those costs, (see Deneweth v. Deneweth, 2004 MBQB 60) or both.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the absence of an invitation or licence or licence to enter the cemetery by climbing the fence of a private cemetery for a male plaintiff cause the male plaintiff injury? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is a common law relationship with a plaintiff who is a plaintiff in a fatal accident action for the purposes of calculating damages? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can a plaintiff who already knows the material facts before the limitation period expired, sit on her rights and not file a claim? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the difference between a plaintiff at bar and plaintiff in a personal injury case? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can a plaintiff amend their pleadings to seek a limitation period on damages? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can an applicant argue that an arbitrator or tribunal has not explicitly considered every argument or issue raised by the parties? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for a motion to delay a plaintiff's claim under the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to prove that they were injured in a motor vehicle accident? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the argument that a jury can deal with complex legal and factual issues in a civil conspiracy trial? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there any case law where a plaintiff has been involved in a motor vehicle accident for 11 years? (Manitoba, Canada)
