In what circumstances have the courts found that the government engaged in a reasonable mid-range consultation in relation to the Dene Tha' First Nation?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Nunatsiavut v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FC 492 (CanLII):
In Dene Tha' First Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Energy and Mines) Grauer J. found that the government engaged in a reasonable mid-range consultation by giving the First Nation the opportunity to make "extensive and wide-ranging submissions", exchanging reports and a "great deal of information, economic, environmental, scientific and speculative", and setting up processes to involve the First Nation "in ongoing development decisions that could give rise to potential adverse impacts on its treaty rights" (at para. 117).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What evidence has been found that no reasonable juror would have found petitioner guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the US Supreme Court refuse to grant a motion to dismiss a motion for contempt of court when there are circumstances that would otherwise result in a miscarriage of justice? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be found guilty of possession of Class A drugs by reason of joint occupancy of the home where heroin was found in the garage? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances have courts found reasonable suspicion in a counterfeit case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does an extradition treaty prohibit government authorized or sponsored kidnapping of an individual from the jurisdiction of one of the signatory nations for the purpose of trying him in the courts of the other signatory nation? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be found in contempt of court for refusing to comply with a court order? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of "substantive reasonableness" used by the Court of Appeal to determine whether a factor relied on by the sentencing court was unreasonable? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How has reasonable doubt been interpreted by courts in defining reasonable doubt? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
In what circumstances have courts found that counsel at issue made false representations to obtain admission to practice law without having to take the bar examination? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the case law on national security and international relations in the context of national security considerations? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
