What is the test for a reviewing court to interfere with an order of costs?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cotter v. Cotter, 2015 BCCA 289 (CanLII):

A reviewing court should interfere with an order of costs only if the trial judge has made an error in principle or if the costs award is plainly wrong: Hamilton v. Open Window Bakery Ltd., 2004 SCC 9at para. 27.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the husband be ordered to pay costs to the wife for his failure to comply with the rules of court and order the wife to pay solicitor and client costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted Bolster Review Review Review for mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order a charging order against costs of a contempt application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order costs against a petitioner who is unsuccessful in his application for a review of a police officer's decision to prohibit him from driving for 24 hours pursuant to section 215(3) of the Criminal Code? (British Columbia, Canada)
When will the court order an order for costs that follow the event? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court be functus officio where it entered an order with respect to liability and damages but retains jurisdiction to order costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court in reviewing child support orders? (British Columbia, Canada)
When will the court order an order of costs in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.