Is it just and appropriate to strike out a plaintiff’s third statement of claim?
Canada (Federal), Canada
The following excerpt is from Gligbe v. Canada, 2017 FC 311 (CanLII):
In these circumstances, it is just and appropriate to strike out the plaintiff’s third statement of claim, without leave to amend (Benaissa v. Canada (Attorney General), 2005 FC 1220 at paragraph 45).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
If Plaintiff fails to replead any of her claims, if the Plaintiff does not replead all of her actions, will the Plaintiff's claims be waived? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the impact of a screening order requiring a plaintiff to amend her Statement of Claim to add new claims? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a plaintiff makes a statement at a police station that was subsequently suppressed as a result of her statements made in the car, what are the consequences of the suppression of the second statement? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a strike for failing to state a claim due to time-barred claims considered a strike? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a claim of inferior rank to be paid prior to that of a superior rank to a plaintiff prior to the filing of a libel claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a plaintiff loses a claim against the municipality on the merits of their constitutional claim, can the municipality still be liable? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is Dismissal appropriate for a motion to dismiss an action where the claim alleges that the claim is invalid? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have to respond to a Defendant's statement stating that the material facts contained in that statement are to be admitted as a matter of law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been successful in their claim for damages from a third party? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the presumption that a person who makes a statement of intent to injure another person be liable for damages if that statement contains two statements of intent? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
