In Glenister v. Rowe, supra, reading from paragraph 2, The question in this case is: does a person against whom a costs order may be made have, before an order is actually made, a contingent liability for such costs… and at paragraph 7, …if there were a contingent liability, that was a bankruptcy debt… Reading from paragraph 18 of the judgment of Lord Justice Mummery, where he is quoting from In Re Wisepark, [1994] B.C.C. 221, …a claim for costs is not a truly contingent claim and that it is a claim which comes into existence when the court makes its order for costs. The plaintiff’s submissions
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.