What must a plaintiff prove to establish negligence?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Parlby v Starr, 2017 BCSC 2353 (CanLII):

There is no dispute about what a plaintiff must prove to establish a claim in negligence: (1) the defendant owed him a duty of care; (2) the defendant breached the standard of care; (3) the plaintiff sustained damage; and (4) that damage was caused, in fact and in law, by the defendant’s breach (Mustapha v. Culligan of Canada Ltd., 2008 SCC 27 at para. 3).

Other Questions


What is the test for establishing causation between a party alleging negligence and a plaintiff alleging negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove that there is a real and substantial possibility of a future event attributable to negligence leading to a future loss of income? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove past events such as negligence on a balance of probabilities? (British Columbia, Canada)
What must a plaintiff prove to establish that a member of a group is liable for the actions of the group? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a plaintiff must prove that there is a substantial possibility of a future event leading to income loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a plaintiff to prove that their injuries were caused by negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove negligence in a motor vehicle accident case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a plaintiff to prove that they were injured as a result of negligence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove that negligence was the sole cause of injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to establish that negligence was the sole cause of injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.