Four years later, in Linshalm v. Haberler, [1997] O.J. No. 2842, E.M. Macdonald J. dealt with a motion for an order for security for costs where the action had been pending for four years. Discoveries were incomplete until three years after the action was commenced. Both parties had retained sophisticated legal counsel early in the fourth year. This led to refocusing of the legal issues and a motion for security for costs. The plaintiff argued the delay in seeking security would prejudice him.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.