What is the effect of Juriansz J. 2002 on this motion?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Fulop v. Duca Community Credit Union Ltd., 2003 CanLII 21968 (ON SC):
The decision of Juriansz J. effectively bars this action as res judicata. See para. 10 of his endorsement dated August 28, 2002. As the respondent on this motion is also an officer of Fulco there is no other reasonable conclusion that can be drawn. See also Bear Island Foundation v. Ontario (1995) O.J. 4290 at para. 30 per Laskin J.A.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
On an interim motion, is it more likely that the court will grant a motion to allow the motion to be heard before trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for elevated costs of a motion for a motion to amend a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion of no confidence in a motion to amend the terms of a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of a motion judge's order of the motions judge on a support order? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of the merger principle on a motion to strike? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the result of a motion to redact reference to settlement conference materials from the applicant's motion? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a request for leave to amend a mid-motion to a motion for summary judgment fair? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a party who brings the motion as well as the witnesses upon whom the moving/applying party relies have an obligation to present and present witnesses to the motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the consequence of a motion judge's decision not to bifurcate the liability and penalty phases of a contempt motion? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a motion for summary judgment be dismissed or adjourned if there are outstanding undertakings on the motion? (Ontario, Canada)
