I agree with the Defendant. The proposed management fee is still subject to the real and substantial likelihood analysis. I can do no better than adopt the wisdom of my brother Quinn J. in Dybongo-Rimando Estate v. Jackiewicz et al., [2001] O.J. No. 3826 (OSC) when he stated at para. 72: “A professional financial advisor should be able to obtain a rate of return (net of his or her fee) that is higher than…[the plaintiff]…would experience if he invested on his own, without professional help. Otherwise, how could such an advisor stay in business?”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.