Does a plaintiff have an obligation to pay damages for breach of contract?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Stewart v. Stewart, 2014 BCSC 766 (CanLII):

The plaintiff referred to Haack v. Martin, 1927 CanLII 57 (SCC), [1927] S.C.R. 413 for the proposition that difficulty in assessing damages does not relieve a wrongdoer of the obligation to pay for damages for breach of contract.

Other Questions


What is the range of damages for damages for breach of a contract where the contract price of a parcel of land was significantly lower than the value of the land at the time the contract was signed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that there is no provision that considers the respondent’s failure to perform his obligations in breach of contract preclude the applicant from seeking damages for non-performance of the contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a plaintiff seek damages for breach of contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have an obligation to reduce their damages by reducing the damages in the context of a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff obtain aggravated damages for mental distress as a result of a breach of contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages that a plaintiff can expect from a third party to recover from a breach of contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the damages for damages for breach of contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff bring a claim against a physician in negligence, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a summary judgment for breach of contract with damages to be assessed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is replacement cost the proper measure for damages in a breach of contract case? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.