In fact, the judgment debtor is claiming that he may be facing examinations on his property and possible seizure. However, this is a hypothetical argument as there is no evidence he owns property. In addition, as in Côté v. Smith,5 we must consider the possibility that one of the respondents may decide to execute a seizure of property against the other director.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.