What is the test for contempt of an order?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Reid v. Reid, 2014 BCSC 2324 (CanLII):
A person should not [be] found in contempt of an order unless the terms of an order are precise and the facts in support of wilful disobedience constitute proof beyond a reasonable doubt: Hama v. Werbes, 2000 BCCA 367.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for contempt of a court order for payment of an order for contempt? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a finding of contempt based on a failure to obey a court order result in the application being subsumed into the contempt order? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a desk order pronounced on February 28, 2011 a dismissal of a request for a custody order and a support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order a charging order against costs of a contempt application? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does an order under s. 9 of the Guidelines on Special and extraordinary expenses include a separate order as to special and extraordinary expense? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of an order to cancel an order for non-payment of a lump sum of funds made in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an order from an application to re-open and re-consider a decision, where the order from the first judgment had been entered, a matter of practice and procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court be functus officio where it entered an order with respect to liability and damages but retains jurisdiction to order costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
