What jurisdiction exists to order security for costs against an individual?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from McLean v Law Society of British Columbia, 2018 BCSC 264 (CanLII):
The court exercises its inherent jurisdiction in deciding whether to order security for costs against an individual. See Gichuru v. Pallai, 2014 BCSC 2330.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is security for costs of an appeal cost more readily than security for trial costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the husband be ordered to pay costs to the wife for his failure to comply with the rules of court and order the wife to pay solicitor and client costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court be functus officio where it entered an order with respect to liability and damages but retains jurisdiction to order costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for ordering security for costs against an individual? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for securing security for costs against a plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on leave to appeal from an order for special costs made separately from the substantive order? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an individual post security for costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for obtaining security for costs against an individual plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a desk order pronounced on February 28, 2011 a dismissal of a request for a custody order and a support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
