Plaintiff cites in favour of recognizing “wrongful life” claims a smattering of American cases, in the vast minority, and Cherry v. Borsman[35]. There, injury was caused by negligence during an attempted abortion of a conceived child. The fetus injured by the procedural negligence was born alive. The doctor was found liable on the basis of ordinary “neighbour” theory[36] -causation of the injury: medical procedure -what duty was breached: duty not to injure fetus subsequently born alive -when in the child’s genesis: in utero
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.