There was a discussion as to costs at the end of the hearing. The authority on the entitlement of a self-represented lawyer to costs is, in this court, Davidson v. Canada (Solicitor-General) (1989), 1989 CanLII 5170 (FCA), 61 D.L.R. (4th) 342, 47 C.C.C. (3d) 104, [1989] 2 F.C. 341. In any event, no special reason within the contemplation of Rule 1618 being apparent, I would dismiss this application without costs.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.