The following excerpt is from Bowater Mersey Paper Co. Ltd. v. Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, 2002 NSSC 198 (CanLII):
A broad error of jurisdiction occurs where the question answered by the decision making entity was within its jurisdiction to determine, but the interpretation was so patently unreasonable that its construction cannot be rationally supported and demands intervention by a court. See CUPE v. City of Montreal, 1997 CanLII 386 (SCC), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 793.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.