What is the effect of a Crown Wardhip with no access for the purposes of adoption?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Children’s Aid Society of Ottawa v J.T. and J.B., 2016 ONSC 5155 (CanLII):
Crown wardship with no access for the purposes of adoption is the most intrusive of the dispositional orders and has been described as capital punishment of family law as set out in Children and Family Services for York Region v. S.S., 2003 CanLII 2408, at para. 2.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the burden of proof on the applicant society seeking a disposition order of permanent Crown Wardship (with adoption as placement), and no access to the biological parents? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a court determine Crown Wardship and access without the need for the Children's Aid Society to prove that the children are adoptable? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court considered control and access to the area in question in determining whether the public had access and invited to use the area on the private property for parking purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Respondent have a right to access and child support and, if not, should his access be supervised? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law regarding access to cannabis for medical purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
Is supervised access appropriate in high conflict custody and access cases? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a religious institution have to be assessed for purposes of assessment purposes? (Ontario, Canada)
Is supervised access a long-term solution to access problems? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a historical access road is an access road? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for including gifts in the calculation of income for the purposes of the purpose of the gifts? (Ontario, Canada)
