Does a vendor have a legal interest in the crop before it is delivered to the elevator?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Rex v. Handsbee, 1923 CanLII 330 (SK CA):
In Rose v. Edmonds 1919 CanLII 234 (SK QB), [1919] 3 W.W.R. 47, Bigelow, J., decided that under The Crop Payments Act, 1915, ch. 34, the vendor has a legal interest in the crop before its delivery at the elevator, and may enter on the land and seize. The learned Justice there added (p. 49): “The agreement itself also provides in par. 15 that the crop shall be the personal property of the vendor.”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a vendor's lien waived by the fact that the vendor is suing the vendor for unpaid purchase money? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a lien against a vendor waived by the fact that the vendor is suing the vendor for unpaid purchase money? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a vendor legally bound to make an offer to a purchaser of land that is not for sale to the purchaser at a price agreed upon? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there a common interest between a plaintiff and the landlord of a parcel delivery company who was injured in a freight elevator that was provided by the landlord? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a vendor be held responsible to the purchaser for the consequences of a latent defect known to the vendor prior to the sale of a house? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a vendor's name be filled in to give effect to the established intention of the vendor? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When a vendor contracts to sell to a purchaser an agreement for a lease and the purchaser subsequently repudiates the contract, can the vendor continue to exercise its right to exercise that right? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
If a vendor takes a personal judgment against a plaintiff, and then withdraws the execution of the contract, what is the effect of the judgment against the vendor? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a subsequent purchaser of the legal estate have to pay the full consideration of the purchase, even after the purchase was completed, if the subsequent purchaser has paid the entire amount of consideration, even though the previous purchaser had a prior equitable interest in the property? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a vendor who failed to deliver a copy of a contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
