What are the reasons for the costs arising from the trial of a family law claim?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Johnson v. Monaghan, 2015 BCSC 2104 (CanLII):
These reasons relate to costs arising from the trial of this family law claim. The trial judgment is reported at Johnson v. Monaghan, 2015 BCSC 1286. The parties at trial asked to address costs after the trial decision was issued. Written submissions have now been received from both parties.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is security for costs of an appeal cost more readily than security for trial costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a party seeking to change the date on which to value family property or family debt under the Family Law Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
When an offer is made by a defendant for a pre-trial settlement is reasonably refused, is the fact that the entire action is ultimately dismissed in its entirety a factor in determining double costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
When an offer made by a defendant for pre-trial settlement is reasonably refused, is the fact that the action is ultimately dismissed in its entirety a factor in determining double costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant time frame for calculating a delay under s. 11(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada for the purpose of computing a reasonable trial within a reasonable time? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of reasonableness for using the term “reasonable” in a claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons given by the judge in the context of the date of trial for value of a family residence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
When an offer made by a defendant for the purpose of achieving a pre-trial settlement is reasonably refused, is the fact that the action is ultimately dismissed in its entirety a consideration for double costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
