I find that the petitioners’ position is an assertion of “genuine belief”. That is not a basis to vary from the general rule on costs. I addressed this in Rowe v. Thomson, 2011 BCSC 617 at para. 10: The expectation of the courts is that parties to litigation have a genuine belief in the correctness of their position. Otherwise, they should not be proceeding to court… Costs are intended to reward the successful party, not assess the level of belief each party may have in the correctness of [his or her] position.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.