Can self-represented litigants be denied recovery of costs by a judge?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Mutsami v. Lees, 2012 ONSC 4678 (CanLII):

"Quite apart from authority and as a matter of principle, it seems to me to be difficult to justify a categorical rule denying recovery of costs by self-represented litigants . . . modern cost rules are designed to foster three fundamental purposes: (1) to indemnify successful litigants for the cost of litigation; (2) to encourage settlements; and (3) to discourage and sanction inappropriate behaviour by litigants. It seems to me that all three purposes are fostered by allowing the trial judge a discretion to award costs to self-represented litigants": Fong v. Chan, supra, at para. 22.

Other Questions


Can self-represented litigants be denied recovery of costs? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for indemnifying successful litigants for the cost of litigation? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the quantum of costs incurred in determining whether a plaintiff is entitled to full recovery costs? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to pay the costs of preparing a Bill of Costs and costs submission in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a self-represented litigant entitled to the same costs as a lawyer? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for a judge to determine the appropriate amount of costs in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the legal costs for a successful litigant in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining costs in a child protection case when the judge has not presided at all or any stage of the proceeding? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances have costs been denied or substantially reduced because of the unsuccessful party's financial circumstances? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors will a judge consider when awarding costs at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.