What is the test for a claim for the cost of future care?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Naidu v. Mann, 2007 BCSC 1313 (CanLII):

The test for whether an item should be allowed for the cost of future care is that set out by McLachlin J. (as she then was) in Milina v. Bartsch (1985), 1985 CanLII 179 (BC SC), 49 B.C.L.R. (2d) 33 at para. 199 (S.C.), aff’d (1987), 49 B.C.L.R. (2d) 99 (C.A.): there must be a medical justification for the claim for cost of future care, and the claim itself must be reasonable.

Other Questions


Is a defendant entitled to a future care claim for future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to advance a future cost of care claim in the context of medical necessity claims? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining a future care award under the heading of cost of future care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can recommendations made by a qualified health care professional support a cost of future care claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to advance a future cost of care claim, in a medical malpractice action, to have a physician testify to the medical necessity of each and every item of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a claim for future care a pecuniary part of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a plaintiff’s future care cost of future care award? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, is cost of future care a consideration in damages for future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to a future care award for the purposes of calculating future care costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.