The test for whether an item should be allowed for the cost of future care is that set out by McLachlin J. (as she then was) in Milina v. Bartsch (1985), 1985 CanLII 179 (BC SC), 49 B.C.L.R. (2d) 33 at para. 199 (S.C.), aff’d (1987), 49 B.C.L.R. (2d) 99 (C.A.): there must be a medical justification for the claim for cost of future care, and the claim itself must be reasonable.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.