A cost of care award requires the following factors to be considered: a) a plaintiff is entitled to be compensated for what is reasonably necessary for restoration to her pre-collision condition; b) the compensation is to provide what is reasonably necessary from an objective view that is based on relevant evidence to maintain and promote the plaintiff’s health; c) the future care items and their associated costs must likely be incurred; in making that assessment, past use or non-use is of assistance as to whether the award should be made; d) negative and positive contingencies must be considered; and e) the assessment is not a precise accounting exercise. Simmavong v. Haddock, 2012 BCSC 473 at paras. 124-128.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.