Courts have been willing, in certain circumstances, to enforce positive rights created under a subsequent oral amendment to a written contract despite such “no oral amendment” clauses. But, as Coombe v. Coombe demonstrates, such a claim for the enforcement of positive rights is very different from an estoppel, which merely attempts to foreclose a party from relying on the strict enforcement of its existing rights under a contract.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.