Are discrete sets of allegations, separated in time, part of a continuing contravention of the Rules of Civil Procedure?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from The Worker v. The Company and another, 2019 BCHRT 235 (CanLII):
The assessment of whether discrete sets of allegations, separated in time, are part of a continuing contravention is fact specific and depends very much on the individual circumstances of each case: Ms. N v. College of Registered Nurses of BC and others, 2018 BCHRT 265 at para. 19 [Ms. N].
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the impact of Rule 37B of the BC Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure on Rule 37 B of the Rules of Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the BCSC interpreted Rule 14-1(9) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure regarding the exercise of discretion of the Court of Appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the BCSC need to approve the proposed amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure to the rules of procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge in a fast-track action depart from the fixed amount under Rule 15-1(15) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of Rule 37B of the Canadian Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure on the duration and expense of litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevance of Rule 11‑6(4) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure requiring a physical examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of Rule 30 of the Rule 40A of the Rules of Civil Procedure on an application for a medical examination that comes three weeks before trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for proportionality under Rule 1-3(2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with motions under Rule 34 and Rule 19(24)(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff proceed by petition under Rule 10(1) of the BC Rules of Civil Procedure to determine whether there were implied terms as alleged? (British Columbia, Canada)
